It must be said first and remembered always that song came first. All of the rest is based on the voice.

Most people who improvise anything do so intuitively. That’s the nature of improvising. It’s feeling your way to a solution. These flutes were used thousands of years ago, long before music was written. Long before there was any kind of music theory that we know. If you would like to improve your music theory and music then you may want to consider installing some home music systems.

Photo: Max Clarke

Improvising is composing on the spot. Or, to put it another way, composing is improvising and then the writing down of that improvising.

All or almost all improvisers know how to put together a set of words or notes or images. They know this from inside. They always knew it. They didn’t learn it. It is instinctive for them. When someone sings a song, they can sing another line that matches that song and yet that is different. If you’re looking to sing with a little improvisation over an already produced beat or track you could look at sites like https://www.producerloops.com/ and start singing your heart out.

This improvised line of song can be close to the first sung line or it can be completely different, just as in a play where you can improvise a line that will fit into the plot and lead straight to the next scene, or where you can improvise a flight of fancy, wild and provocative, that will bring a new light to the action and only then will lead back into the drama.

In improvising you can be completely innovative or use material that you have reworked many times and remembered to bring it now to a new meaning.

In commedia dell’arte, a drama form from the Renaissance and before, the actors knew what a given scene was supposed to accomplish, but the actual dialogue was up to them. They improvised it.

There are some film directors who work this way. They will tell the actors what they are trying to accomplish and then will ask those actors to make up the lines that will move the story along. This can be an exhilarating and terrifying process.

A solo or a cadenza in a musical work is an improvised passage that will elaborate on the meaning of the song.

The solo can go off into a whole new territory, or it can stay close to the main idea of the piece and comment on that idea. The choice is up to the soloist. Franz Liszt used to murder his pianos onstage in front of hundreds of people. He was one of the great charismatic improvisors. Like Niccolò Paganini. Photo: Max Clarke

I once asked a classical violin player what scale she would use to play over an A7b9 chord and she gave me a blank look. I realized suddenly that she only played the notes on the paper and never gave any thought, perhaps, as to why those notes were there and not some other notes. It was not always this way in classical music. Mozart was an incredible improvisor and he played ex tempore for hours. If you love to listen to music, it is important that you have the right listening equipment so that you do not sacrifice on quality, as Graham Slee HiFi reports.

Beethoven played at parties and there are many stories of his improvising with passion and precision. When this man wrote “Freude,” he meant “Joy.” Foto: Maximiliano Clarke

Max Clarke found this license plate.

Some music, such as jazz, is mostly improvisation. A theme is stated at the beginning of the work and then each musician plays his idea of that theme, and, then, at the end, the theme is restated by everyone.

In early jazz in New Orleans, for example, the musical idea was stated at the beginning and then all the musicians improvised together on that idea until the end where the theme was again played by the entire ensemble. Everyone followed the chords, the harmony, of the piece but each person played his/her on take on that harmony.

Each musician is a composer in this style and often the solos were so beautiful and so complete that they were written down and they became different tunes in their own right.

A Max Clarke photograph

In the bop era (1940s more or less), Charlie Parker played songs like How High The Moon with such originality and verve that his solos became separate tunes in themselves.

One of his ideas on How High The Moon is called Ornithology.

In Big Brother and the Holding Company, we played a song called Cuckoo for so long and with such wild abandon that it became a different song. We wrote some new words for it and called it Oh, Sweet Mary.

There are some tools that can be learned in music that will help when a great improvising idea occurs, so that the player will be ready to make the most of an inspired moment.

Photo: Max Clarke

It helps to have a personal collection of things to play over a given chord. Ideas that can be changed and put together in new ways. These ideas should be learned in all keys, of course, and in as many different time changes, as possible, so when the times comes, you can plug them in immediately and without conscious effort.

Most musicians learn the ‘spellings’ of the different kinds of chords: major, minor, augmented, diminished, dominant seventh, so they are not completely surprised when one of these sounds is called for.

The spelling of a chord is what the chord is made of, what makes a major chord different from a minor chord, or a minor from a diminished, and so on.

The chromatic scale is important. Improvising musicians learn how to play it from each finger. They learn this either consciously or unconsciously.

Learning the modes (‘moods’) is interesting and useful.

At first, the aeolian mode was the most interesting to us. James Gurley and I played in the phrygian mode quite often. Later the dorian mode became important. Some people have made a religion out of the lydian mode. All the modes are beautiful and each has its own character. Once again, to understand really what is going on here, each of these modes should be learned in all keys.

The mixolydian mode G A B C D E F G is used for the dominant seventh chord G7, so we played/play that one a lot, since rock and roll is mostly a dominant seventh kind of music.

And now I am going to ask my friends to tell me how they began to improvise and what moves them about their music. I’ll begin with the first improvisor that I knew, Jimmy Cuomo, who was fourteen years old when I met him and already incredibly accomplished.

Jimmy is second from right here.

Jim Cuomo (second from left, barely visible) has this to say:

Rob Clores: I do remember the first time I improvised and it was also the first song I remember learning. Comin’ Home Baby.

I was 5 years old watching my father sit at the piano and play and sing the song. He showed me the basic chords. 5ths in the bass and the melody and after he left I basically tried to riff on the melody and make up my own variations.

So I guess it started out copying my dad but then I intuitively started to try to create pleasing patterns.

Rob Clores did the New York version of Love, Janis, with me and then we played a spectacular concert in Central Park.

Jan Koopman lives in the Netherlands. He writes: First I got when eight years old classic piano lessons, and after a few years my father bought an electronic organ for me, this gave me more fun.

Jan Koopman is the master of one of those instruments, the Hammond B3 organ, that you play with everything you’ve got, both arms, both legs, all your fingers, all of your brain, all of your heart and soul.

Kristina Kopriva Rehling: Jazz Saxophonist Richie Cole, heard me practicing classical Music on my Violin, came thru the door at my Parents Private School, his Daughter 4 was a student of mine, Annie . He said to me, “you’re never going be complete sticking w/ Classical,” I said why? He said…” 1. Kristina, you’ve got too much soul . 2. You’re bending notes all over the place in your Bach piece, and it’s a clear giveaway that you need to fly away into Jazz & Blues.”

He then invited me to play w/ him at The American Music Hall. He went easy on me the first time, Blues in C I think. We traded 4?s, and I could not wait to learn more:)

That’s Kristina Kopriva Rehling, beautiful woman, talented violinist, good friend. She sang a set with us at the Sebastiani Theatre in Sonoma last year.

Jesse Malley : I think that in a way I have always been an intuitive improviser. In my late teens, I remember jamming with some bands and being able to improvise melodies and lyrics, but I was very shy about it.

My confidence (or lack of it) stood in the way of my gut feeling, as well as straining everything through my brain before it came out, compromising my ability to be in the moment.

When I moved to LA in my early 20?s and started singing at open mic blues nights, all of these distractions seemed to disappear with every song. I started paying attention to the band, to the cues, less attention to the audience and my thoughts, and just started playing from my gut. The more I played out with strangers, the less I feared the unknown on stage. More than anything, playing live shows has been the best experience I’ve had in learning to play off the charts.

Learning to read body language, and paying attention to the other musicians on the stage. My breakthrough would have to be when I was about 23, when I stopped being terrified of improvising, and started being able to enjoy it. I think after you’ve had a few mistakes, blunders or train wrecks onstage, the worst case scenario doesn’t seem so bad anymore.

Jesse Malley performs in San Diego these days, and I am hoping she will come and join Big Brother for some shows in that area soon.

Arne Frager from the Record Plant checks in with this: I studied piano classical music as a young child of 5 years old and studied piano until the age of 18.

At the age of 12 I took up the upright string bass in junior high and played in the orchestra and began to play in pop bands and jazz groups. Since I read music and could sight read, I usually had a lead sheet or a fake book to guide me.

That’s Arne Frager, bass player, talented musician, producer, genius in residence.

Anthea Sidiropoulos: I remember wanting to learn to scat and listened to Ella Fitzgerald’s A tisket A tasket, How high the moon – mimicked her scatting – then moved on to other standards and found I could not only emulate the scats but build my own take on them. I remember gaining an awareness during my early childhood when i was having private piano and music theory tuition. This gave me an understanding about scales, keys and the mechanics of music.

This gave me confidence and allowed my improvising ability to ‘fly’ and ‘dance’ around musical arrangements. I remember my teacher including ‘ear’ exercises as my aural abilities excelled during these formative years. I would say this would have contributed to how I learned to improvise. I could ‘hear’ where my vocal notes ‘felt’ right and where they felt they did not fit in the piece.I never ‘learned’ to improvise per se – it seemed to happen naturally, especially as my courage and confidence increased. A ‘freeing’ experience of the soul if you like. I can relate this to meditation at times, especially when chanting.

I grew up in a family where singing was a given, (privately though.. anything further was a no, no) and my parents harmonised naturally as the Greek folk songs allowed for this as the norm. I picked up a natural ability to harmonise on virtually any melody. I started improvising along with harmonising to the tune. formative years of piano and music theory and after a 15year gap of music where I regained the ability to improvise again.

Anthea Sidiropoulos lives in Melbourne, Australia, and I am hoping to do some shows with her there.

Barry Melton: I was born into a left-wing activist family and my earliest years were spent in a small enclave of folks in Brooklyn, New York.

Woody Guthrie was a neighbor (I went to Marge Guthrie’s dance school for a while), my dad was friends with Paul Robeson and I can’t remember a time when I didn’t know Ramblin’ Jack Elliott.

I’m told I was at the Peekskill riots as a toddler and my mother sang and played folk music on the piano – songs of the Spanish Civil War, the Civil Rights struggle, blues and just plain folk music from all over the world.

My parents were determined I would be a musician and play for the struggle, so they made sure I started young, really young.

It was my idea to become a lawyer when I grew up, but it’s not in the least ironic that I started my adult life just as my parents had planned – on stage with a guitar in my hands.

My first guitar instructor was not a guitarist. He as a retired violinist from the New York Philharmonic. I was trained classically on guitar from the age of five to approximately the age of eight. I literally learned to read and write music around the same time as I learned to read and write English. Mr. D’Aleo was an older adult, perhaps in his 70’s. He was extraordinarily disciplined and drilled me incessantly; he also taught me music theory, and a significant component of my instruction involved reading and writing music (on staff paper).

Things couldn’t have taken a sharper turn when my family moved from New York to Los Angeles in 1955. Milton Norman, my first and only guitar instructor in Los Angeles, was a ‘50’s avant garde jazz guitarist. He played with the Kay Kyser big band and a host of small jazz combos.

But his approach to the instrument was mostly “chordal,” i.e., for him guitar was a rhythm instrument that used complex chords to help lay the foundation for horn-playing soloists, pianists and singers.

From 1959 on, at age 12, I was thoroughly captivated by the folk music revival. And wow, was I ready: Kids all over the place seemed to be adopting the music I grew up with. My parents’ friends were becoming icons. I listened assiduously to the folk show that Les Claypool hosted on FM radio.

I played my guitar with such ferocity that, during my transition into puberty, I nearly got my family evicted from our modest apartment in the San Fernando Valley.

By the age of 14, I was getting friends just a few years older – Bill Bernds, Bruce Engelhardt, Steve Mann – to drive me around L.A. and join in numerous blues and folk jams across the Valley and over the hills into Hollywood.

And Steve Mann, a near-neighbor who shared my passion for country blues, was becoming a star, ultimately playing on the first Sonny & Cher recordings and backing Gale Garnett on “We’ll Sing In The Sunshine.”

It was there, in the foyer of the Ash Grove on Melrose Avenue in Hollywood (McCabe’s Guitar Shop was a little annex in the front part of the club, as was the foyer) that I and a host of young and aspiring musicians (Taj Mahal, Ry Cooder) got to “jam” with virtually every musician who came through town.

Brownie and Sonny, Doc Watson, Mance Lipscomb, Gary Davis and a long list of names that, for me, touch the very essence of where my music comes from.

And the circle, that was sometimes small and sometimes too big for the room, had a participatory component that left room for anyone who had something to contribute to play a little louder while the rest of the circle accommodated whoever was soloing.

By the time I got my own car on my 16^th birthday, I drove for the single purpose of picking up blues and folk musicians on tour and taking them around town, or as part of my never ending quest to jam with other musicians in some blurred scrabble of black and white, blues and country, music.

I drove my high school friend, Bruce Barthol, out to the prophet in Woodland Hills to participate in the “Hoots” run by folksinger Michael Wilhelm; or, on one ill-fated voyage to a party at the Chambers Brothers Jug Band’s house in Silver Lake, my friend Steve Mann riding shotgun managed to get us busted and he went to jail, while I got detained as a juvenile and my parents were called.

As a devoted “folkie,” I had a belief that real music had to be learned from the oral tradition and it was inauthentic to learn from recordings. So I sought out musicians to “lead,” as was the blues tradition as I understood it. I drove Mance Lipscomb around when he first came to Los Angeles, and it was honor and privilege to “lead” Bukka White and Rev. Gary Davis, too.

I don’t think it would be an exaggeration to say I played guitar 40 hours a week between the ages of 12 and 18; and I’m often surprised and delighted to realize I actually squeezed something of a crude education into the mix.

I’ve known Barry Melton a long time now, almost fifty years. He gave me some good advice about how to construct my solo on Piece of My Heart. If I were ever in trouble legally, he is the man I would see, because he is a lawyer and I’m not.

Jack Perry: I was forced into improvising when first given a guitar with no lessons attached, no chord chart, not even decent radio reception. So I developed by way of the “hunt and peck” system. If something sounded good, I tried to memorize it to mix it in with other such riffs.

I think a friend at school taught me the opening notes to Windy so I began integrating a more traditional scale approach to the hunting and pecking.

Some months later a friend taught me the first few lines of Santana’s Black Magic Woman (over the phone!) , so I added more of a blues scaling and technique.

I performed Black Magic Woman in an early combo of friends to a church crowd. I had only ever memorized those first few lines, the rest of the performance was an improvised extension of them.

Jack Perry now plays differently tuned guitars in a very original and beautiful context. Just the pure sound of these guitars is emotional and beguiling.

My friend Jason Castle writes: My first experience with music for many years was singing. So, I learned by ear, including how to harmonize, thanks to my mother’s experience singing harmonies with her father and sisters (who all sang in the choir at church). When I was in grade school, I sang in a trio with two girls, and we just made up the harmonies, improvised them, I guess you could say.

Go with the flow.

Kurt Huget writes: My first explorations in improvisation began in my early teens, on both guitar and piano, playing along with records and the radio. I found that I needed a lot of time and patience to delve into it, so I gravitated towards the music of blues bands and the great San Francisco rock bands, because their songs often stretched out longer than the typical 2-3 minute pop tunes of the time.

It gave me the freedom to try out any musical ideas that came to mind, change course when they weren’t quite sounding right, and work out riffs and themes, step by step.

Learning the blues pentatonic scale was a big breakthrough, because it gave me the musical vocabulary to take a solo anywhere I wanted to.

Such a simple scale, but with endless possibilities.

I must add that, at times, smoking pot helped in the improvisation process.

I think that smoking pot freed me up to play more intuitively, that is, to “feel” the music, rather than “think” it.

My guitar buddy Greg Douglass weighs in with this: I started off taking lessons from a fellow who recognized that, beneath the timid & clumsy musical veneer I presented to him every week, there was at least a proton's worth of talent. He attempted to remake me in his image as a jazzer. Being 14 and having just seen The Beatles on Ed Sullivan, I not only rejected being the next Kenny Burrell but quit lessons entirely to devote private study to pop music structures and how to pick up girls.

I slavishly copied solos and changes and, in doing so, learned about how to put together a song, even prior to learning the Circle of Fifths.

However, I lived in the Bay Area. The pendulum was swinging heavily towards more freedom; extended solos, Eastern modes, feedback...freedom! Suddenly, I had all the room in the world to move musically and no knowledge to back it up.

I was still stuck in the minor pentatonic ghetto that so many of my guitar students still find themselves mired in to this day. My band, a Top 40 cover band, discovered pot and began experimenting musically.

I spent hours on my couch at U.C. Berkeley, creating the basic outlines to long solos and desperately trying to solve the puzzle of the fretboard. I still felt like a fraud and a one-trick pony...hell, I was learning to play guitar in front of large crowds, opening for people like Ten Years After and Jeff Beck.

Humility came very easily to me. I knew next to nothing and was jamming one-on-one with guys like Terry Haggerty and Peter Green. The bar was set very, very high.

Two fortuitous things then happened. I quit Berkeley and went to DVC, a junior college in Concord CA. I took 3 music courses, Theory 101 and Harmony 1 & 2. I learned about the rules, I did sight-singing (I still have nightmares about sight-singing to this day!), I wrote pieces for string quartets (and ended up dating the smoking hot cello player)....I learned about music in a holistic, non-guitar-oriented context.

But...I would still look at the neck and go blank. "That's an A note!", I would proudly explain. There was still no grand scheme on the guitar neck. I could not see things in a logical, musical pattern. I got by for ages with a kind of false bravado and a macho ethic of "When in doubt, play really, really fast!".

One day, I picked up a book of scales. The scales were shown separately, but given a context: there were chord shapes the scales were hung on. After learning the separate scales, I learned how to play the scale positions as they flowed into one another. One day, I looked at the neck and saw not a chaotic blur of separate notes, but a recurring pattern of chord shapes that was never-ending and gave birth to a new world of melodic possibilities.

I had "discovered" the CAGED method about 5 years into my six-stringed journey, and everything was different from that day forward. I had the knowledge from my years spent poring over difficult problems in harmony, but now there was a practical basis for everything. I understood modes, I understood what went where and why...I understood the rules well enough to break them with confidence.

My greatest gift as a teacher is being able to explain these musical parameters to others on a daily basis. While the names "Douglass" and "Coltrane" won't be put next to one another anytime...except perhaps alphabetically..I know enough to enter improvisational situations with a sense of confidence, potential fun, and adventure. I often use advice I've given to a student when I'm onstage to help me break out of my own self-created ruts.

Nothing makes me happier than confronting a wall of apathetic ears in a smooth jazz type setting (restaurants, cocktail parties...funerals..) with a swift barrage of whole tone runs or a series of tritones (nothing like The Devil's Interval to put a dent in some aging debutante's carefully coiffed composure!).

That's Greg Douglass, the original Diabolus in Musica.

Wesley Freeman, left, with brothers Ming and Tracy, writes to me : I first thought about improvisation when I went to the Kadena Officers Club on Okinawa one night.

I think I was about 16 at the time, and I went there to watch my guitar teacher Tiny Umali play with his jazz trio. He not only played these wonderful complex chords, but he played all these notes around them, and from that moment on, I was fascinated by the idea of being to play beyond just the chord and the original melodies.

I watched a lot of people play after that, and paid close attention to how they took the melodies and would build on them, creating landscapes in the air.

A few years later, in Taipei, we had been following Joe Zawinul and early Weather Report for a few months, and one day, we were just playing in our living room studio, and began to jam, and that was the first time I remember actually trying to stretch out and create something new, something created out of mostly space and time, and some elements from the original theme

When you don’t know what you are doing, it seems like there are no boundaries, no rules, and that can be a very liberating feeling, and sometimes the results are spectacular. That first jam was amazing.

However, as time goes by, I think musicians realize that without some rules, some structure, that chaos will inevitably result. So…learning some rules, and figuring out how things are put together I think is essential to good improvisation…having the right tools is always one of the first rules of the garage.

The truth is, there are no limits to improvisation. Even the sky is not the limit. The only boundary is the place where you stop to catch a breath, or to let people know that you finished this particular story for the moment, or when it is time to let someone else in the band solo.

Wesley Freeman had his first band in Okinawa, Japan, just as I did, and then he went on to have some very successful bands in Taipei, Taiwan, and later on the mainland USA.

Jude Gold: Yes, I remember the very moment I first started improvising on guitar. Kind of like the day I first rode a bike. I remember it.

I think a lot of my melodic type of improvising is from learning to play lap style guitar when I was about 8, for it made me need to play in tune while sliding all over the string.

I feel that improvising is an intuitive kind of process based on all the musical genres/influences and tricks that one uses as they develop their own signature sound and tonality, that is at least what I have tried to do, I also feel like we still can find improvisational nuggets as we continue to play and hopefully can remember them! I like enjoying the moment when those events occur!

I wish I could think like some of the great jazz guitarists because adding some of those passages to my blues/rock n roll repertoire would be very cool, One memory I do have is this. I thought I was pretty good in college and was playing these hokey box pattern solos, trying to be bluesy and a very low key friend of mine played all these patterns, tearing it up and bending all over the fretboard with a real fluid delivery. I immediately tried to steal as much as I could from him, he was very giving and I was very humbled by the whole situation.

David Aguilar plays with everyone. He put in some years with Norton Buffalo and they made a couple of ferocious CDs. Dave plays with Big Brother and the Holding Company sometimes and he’s a joy to work with onstage.

Kate Russo: The first improvising I remember doing is singing, making up melodies, as a very little child- maybe 3? 4?
Next, I recall trying to play songs by ear, that were above my reading level on piano, when I was about six. My improvisation would include “learning” songs like “the entertainer”, where I would fill in the missing gaps of music I didn’t know with improvisational parts until I could modulate back to the next part I could remember.

When I was about eight, I played clarinet in my first real excursion in improvisation, imitating Benny Goodman. Took it further with my first group (which was a trio of trumpet, trombone and clarinet) when I was about 10-11. We played Dixieland music. My improvisation mainly consisted of blindly playing notes and patterns that “sounded right” in the style, combined with a method of trying to “sing” my part through the instrument.

Intuition has always been the backbone of my improvisation. Over the years I have spent more and more time thinking about music; particularly songwriting and improvisation.

First improvisation was mainly about playing lines (melodies, parts, not just leads), that I felt I could “hear”, that weren’t there. Spontaneous, melodies, and harmonies always came naturally. Like making up harmonies and singing along with every great song I heard on the radio.

In Boccherini with the late Jonathan Mishne, who introduced you and me to each other, when I was 20-21, I learned more about improv. We did exercises to improve our improv ideas. Some included: scale motion, thirds, arpeggios, trills, gestures (like glissando, bends, “chicken scratchin'”). Big breakthrough on the “technical”, not melodic, side!

We had some great sayings! Here are a few favorites: K I S S: Keep It Simple, Stupid! When in doubt, lay out!

Once is irrelevant, twice is a coincidence, but three times is a pattern!

From my earliest experiences, I found that by learning other people’s great solos that were improvised (from the records) note for note, with emphasis on color, articulation, vibrato etc, it gave me a terrific background in terms of what it should “sound like”– with rising and falling lines, crescendo, decrescendo, dynamics, intensity, articulation– all of these things are so important!

Other big breakthroughs included: Learning Stevie Ray Vaughan killer guitar licks on violin, by ear – again, note-for-note– and began to use the gestures and make the sounds of one instrument on a different instrument– this elicits wild audience response!

Learning different blues patterns (the “3 Kings” Albert King, Freddie King, and BB King; Jimi Hendrix, Eric Clapton, Duane Allman) added a lot to my improv vocabulary. Incorporating famous melodies into the mental arsenal was always a biggie- especially Beatles or classical, for me. (Sound familiar, Mr. In The Hall Of The Mountain King?!). Some favorites are Eleanor Rigby, Let It Be, Purple Haze, Night Train, Humoresque– to name a scant few.

“Gestures” deserve their own special place in my improv vocabulary. They include articulation as well as notes and their colors. For instance, a gliss with a long slow bow, vs a gliss with tremolo. Spiccato and ricochet bowings factor heavily in the Gestures category. Whistle sounds, speaking sounds (like “thank you”) are very effective also.

In the last few years of playing I have really stretched myself with learning licks that seem more “natural” to my instrument (violin), but “spicing them up” with gestures and notes from other kinds of instruments, like a train whistle sound with bends like a guitar. This is an interesting approach to improv, by improvising the actual improv (if that makes any sense). Also taking my tonal style into consideration– like volume swells with the bow, smooth “oriental” sound, sitar sounding patterns.

Kate Russo has played many times with Big Brother and she even sang on one of our engagements. That was in Mexico City where we had a lot of fun.

See you next week?

Sam Andrew Photo: Joanne Lasnier

__________________________________________________

The Japanese Language

????????????????????   Koko ni eigo o hanaseru hito wa imasu ka.   Does anyone here speak English?

Nihongo        Japan language

Ni                                   hon                          go

All license plate photographs are courtesy of Max Clarke.

Japanese is quite similar to, of all languages, Latin. Both idioms are heavily inflected, so there is often no need for pronouns. Pretend you are sending a telegram where every word costs a lot. So you are going to try to say something meaningful with absolutely as few words as possible. That’s Japanese.  You don’t say ‘I bought,’ you say ‘bought.’  ‘I bought a book’ becomes ‘bought book.’  You don’t say ‘I love you.’  You say ‘loving.’ This isn’t slangy or colloquial. It is built into the language which is telegraphic in the extreme.

There can be, and often are, four different writing systems in one Japanese sentence, anyone of which would be sufficient to write the entire language: kanji, hiragana, katakana and Romaji (Rome letters, which is what the Japanese call our alphabet).

Or, as one of the early Jesuits in Japan, probably Matteo Ricci, put it, one hesitates for an epithet strong enough to describe a language where a separate writing system is required to explain the existing writing system.

Three different writing systems on one subway sign.  Any one of these systems would be capable of writing Tokyo Metro Ikebukuro Station.

Japanese has cases like Latin or German or Russian. There are small one syllable words to mark what case it is. This word wa can mark the nominative case.

• ? wa for the topic which can be different from the subject of the sentence.

?????????? Watashi wa sushi ga ii desu. (literally) “As for me, sushi is good.”   or   I like sushi.

Yesterday I book bought.            Yesterday book bought.      The word order is like Latin. Subject, Object, Verb.

????      yamato kotoba     wago ??       The words the Japanese use for their original, native language before the adoption of so many Chinese words which came along with the Chinese writing system.

I ku ra   (how much?):   Until you get a feel for how Japanese is stressed, it is probably a good idea to put equal stress on every syllable. Count 1,2,3 and listen to how you say each number very evenly. Then try to accent the Japanese the same way.  1  2  3   i  ku ra. Give the last syllable as much stress as you do the second syllable. 1  2  3. I ku ra.

I ku ra. I put ra in italics, because for English speakers, there is a strong tendency to swallow or minimize that last syllable, I ku (ra), but in Japanese it is as strongly pronounced as the other two syllables. 1 2 3.  I ku ra.

Remember to ‘roll the r’ so to an Anglophone the word will sound like i ku da.

English speakers like to accent the penultimate syllable, so for the airport name in Tokyo, Narita, what English speakers say is something like ‘Na REE da,’ (same stress pattern as I need a…) which no Japanese is going to understand. Say Narita like 1 2 3   Na dee ta  1  2  3 and at least you will be understood. Be sure and pronounce the T as in Tom, and roll the r.  Because your giving equal stress to each syllable, it will sound to you, an English speaker, as if the last syllable is the one stressed but it is merely being given equal stress which you are not used to hearing.

If you say Na dee TAH, you will be much closer to the actual Japanese pronunciation of this airport name.

Here is an example of two phrases that we use that have three equal parts with almost equal stress. They are:  coup d’état and ‘stay on top.’

If you say Narita with even stress on each syllable, as in coup d’état, it will be much more comprehensible than the Na REE da that rhymes with ‘Juanita.’

1  2  3    Na  ri  ta.  Stay on top.

Head good. Atama ii.     She’s smart.    She has a good head.   See how telegraphic the language is?  In English, we say ‘Smart,’ and that gets the idea across, but ‘smart’ is colloquial, laconic.  Not in Japanese.  In Japanese ‘head good’ is a perfectly normal way to say ‘she’s smart.’

You are smart.  (As for you, head good.)

Japanese has a stress system that sounds to us like a metronome. Very even and, to us, unaccented.  Our language is so stressed, so accented that imPORtant SYLlables tend to LEAP OUT at you. UnderSTAND?  Japanese is much more even.

When you hear a Japanese speaker speaking quickly, the speech can sound like those syllables that Indian tabla players say. Japanese can sound like a drum solo.

??????????    Kochira wa Tanaka-san desu      This is Ms./Mrs./Mr. Tanaka.

??????????????????????????
Tanaka-san is rich, handsome, and charming, isn’t he?         

Different ways to address someone, male or female, who is named Tanaka. The first vertical line of characters on the left is Tanaka-kun. This is the way young people address each other.

The second vertical line above reads Tanaka-chan, and this is an imitation of the way babies pronounce ‘san,’ so it is used to speak to infants and small children or someone very familiar to the speaker.

The third line is Tanaka-sama. Sama is an honorific title, almost like saying ‘reverend,’ or ‘honored.’

The first vertical line on the right above is Tanaka-san, the usual way of addressing someone named Tanaka.

Dative case:         ???????????? Tanaka-san ni agete kudasai        Please give it to Mr. Tanaka.  

Yatta!     ???!    Did it!      He doesn’t see the need to say ‘I.’

??????        Kare ga yatta.            He did it.

It’s cool.   Kakkoii.

Urayamashii!     ????!         Jealous!       I, you, she, he, it, we, they  The pronoun is unspecified and depends on the context. Japanese is a very ‘telegraphic’ language. If someone says in English, “What are you doing?” you can say “Thinking” because the context makes it clear who is thinking.

It’s the same in Japanese, only more so.

??????? 

Oshiete moratta    She explained it to me.

Oshiete ageta (??????)     [I/we] explained [it] to [him/her/them]

??????????????Odoroita kare wa michi o hashitte itta.      The amazed he ran down the street.  

This isn’t said this way in English but it is in Japanese. I suppose it’s more like  Amazed, he ran down the street.

Ablative case:     ???????? Nihon ni ikitai “I want to go to Japan.”

????????????      p?t? e ikanai ka?      Won’t you go to the party?

Genitive case:         ??????      watashi no kamera        my camera         

?????????????        Suk?-ni iku no ga suki desu      (I) like going skiing.

• 
• ? o for the accusative case.     Not necessarily an object.           ???????? Nani o tabemasu ka?      What will (you) eat?

     Oishii.       Delicious.       You hear and say this word very often in Japan.

       Genius.

       Aishoka         bibliophile

hon (?)    book, books        There is no plural.     It’s like ‘sheep’  or ‘deer.’           Every noun in Japanese can be singular or plural.

?        hito        person   or  people

ii desu (????)     It is OK.                ii desu-ka ??????Is it OK?

?????      O namae wa         (What’s your) name?.

Pan o taberu ??????? I will eat bread or I eat bread

Pan o tabenai  ???????? I will not eat bread or I do not eat bread   Pan o tabenakatta  ??????????  I did not eat bread.

????          hen na hito          a strange person

Photo:   Max Clarke

Gai jin:    We are often called this when we are in Japan.               henna gaijin  weird foreigners

The first rule of saying “you” in Japanese is that you don’t say “you” in Japanese.  That’s only a slight exaggeration.

It is worth noting that the word you isn’t in any of these three sentences. In day to day speech there are very few pronouns in Japanese.

??????             Kimi no Na wa Kibou     Your name is hope.         kimi “you” (? “lord”)    Kimi is a word for you used by boyfriends for their girlfriends.

??     Anata “you” (??? “that side, yonder”)    Married women use this ‘you’ when speaking to their husbands.

It then comes to mean something like the American affectionate term ‘honey.’  If written ?? (anata), the person addressed is female.

?? (omae) – your pet, someone very close to you or someone you hate. It literally means in front or facing.

?      onore          Someone you really hate

??          kisama          This is a you that you really don’t like.

?      nanji            thou

??         (sonata)         archaic and similar to thou

???              temee           Someone you really hate

You might be yakuza you hate them so much.

??               otaku                 someone emotionally distant and unknown to you

Pronouns are not much used in Japanese. In fact, they may be less used than anywhere else in the world. Here are, however, some pronouns for I/me and what they say about the speaker.    The most common word for I is ? watashi.  Japanese often point to their nose when we would point to our heart to say “Me?”

Once again, try to keep the syllable stress equal until you get a feel for the accent.  The stress really is there, but it is much more subtle than in English, so try to say ? watashi the way you would say 1 2 3 with equal stress on each syllable.    wa ta shi 1 2 3.

Listen carefully to how a native speaker says the word.

? atashi  Almost the same word as watashi and it is written the same but this word is used by girls and guys-who-want-to-be-girls only.  Yoko is saying atashi here. How do I know? Because those little tiny characters to the right of ? say atashi.  Those small ‘letters’ are called furigana and they are what I was talking about earlier when I quoted the Jesuit who said something like ‘one hesitates for an epithet strong enough to describe a written language that needs another written language to explain it.’ Furigana are often used, as here, to give the ‘alphabetic’ (actually ‘syllabic’) rendering of a kanji. They are often used in childrens’ books and in texts for non Japanese speakers. It seems very out of character to me that Yoko would call herself atashi. She seems a much stronger character than that, although atashi perfectly renders the English Just me! The middle line says Ono Yoko in katakana. So here you see on one signboard four systems of writing, kanji, hiragana, katakana and romaji.

? watakushi, first person pronoun used by rich old men, butlers and princesses.

? boku has the literal meaning servant.    Used by female or male prepubescent children or young boys.

? ore        This is the rough, tough I.  Truck drivers, lumberjacks and other manly men use it.

? ora   How farmers and other rural people say ‘I.’

        Who is it?

I have a friend named Yukiko but I am not sure what kanji she uses to write her name.  There are several choices.

Yuki  happiness, fortune

    Yuki      will, intention, motive

American speakers say her name like Yu KEE ko to rhyme with ‘you freako,’ but Japanese say her name like 1  2  3. Yu Ki Ko to rhyme with ‘don’t you know?’  The Ko is as important as the Ki. More important actually, since Ko has a separate meaning. Yukiko’s husband Peter calls her Yuki. It’s a more grown up name.

Yukiko means Yuki girl, or even Yuki child, so there has been a feminist movement in Japan to drop the Ko after women’s names.  The woman’s name becomes Yuki, or Yo, or Nori, instead of Yukiko, Yoko or Noriko.

I have a teacher, a ??, on Okinawa. Her name is Nao, but she was probably born Naoko. Nao has several meanings. This kanji means big, large, great.  Not the most flattering name for a woman.

   This nao can mean furthermore/still/yet/more/still more/greater/further/less.  Rather abstract for a woman’s name.

  This nao means what it looks like:   direct/in person/soon/at once/just/near by/honesty/frankness/simplicity/cheerfulness/correctness/being straight/night duty.  I could see this word being used for a woman’s name.

    Or this?   I’m just guessing because I did not see Nao-san’s name written when I was on Okinawa.

     Nao-san, left above, was my ??  sensei, teacher on Okinawa.  These kanji read ‘Naoko,’ but she dropped the ko and became Nao.

Photo:   Wesley Freeman

  in hiragana is   and in katakana is    and in romaji is Naoko.

Nao’s name may be written several different ways in kanji alone.  She can be or or or and several other ways as well.  Sometimes a person will change the ‘spelling’ of her name for many different reasons at different stages in her life.

Hito ga ii.     Good person.   Good natured person.

?? atsui “to be hot”) which can become past (???? atsukatta “it was hot”), or negative (???? atsuku nai “it is not hot”). Note that nai is also an i adjective, which can become past (?????? atsuku nakatta “it was not hot”     ?????? Gohan ga atsui. “The rice is hot.”     ???? atsuku naru “become hot”.

Takayama Jinai       Japanese name written with four characters.      Takayama means ‘high mountain.’

???      ano yama      that mountain

???????????????

Omoshiroii.        Interesting, funny.

She doesn’t think so.

The phrase under the images means Ten common phrases that stump Japanese students of English

This gentleman will pay for everything.     ??????????    (konohito ga zembu haraimasu)

????         ??????????     Jissai ni atta koto da.        It actually happened.

In Japan there are soft drinks named sweat and piss.

Donna shigoto o shite iru no.

What kind of work do you do?

?????????????????

Kanojo wa shashin yori jissai no hou ga utsukushii.      She is prettier than her picture.

??????????????????  Kare wa kawarimono da to hyouban daga jissai sou da.      He is said to be eccentric and he really is.

Cheerful.       Akarui.

Clever.     Kashikoi.

What’s the matter?   (Doo shita no.)

I spilled coffee in my car.

?????????      Dai joobu desu.    That’s all right.

You hear the question ???????? Dai joobu desuka? a lot in Japan. Everyone is trying to reassure each other. Is it OK? Is it allowed?

????????????   attractive

When was that?

Keizo

Sam Andrew                                        Michel Bastian          Kyoto     1995            Photo:   Keizo Yamazawa

????????????????????      ky?to ni itta koto ga arimasuka.          Have you ever been to Kyoto?

____________________________________________________________

DNA: the most unusual molecule on earth.

In the cell is a nucleus and in the nucleus are forty-six chromosomes and in the chromosomes are long strands of deoxyribonucleic acid. How long are the strands of DNA? About two meters. So, in every one of the ten thousand trillion cells in your body are roughly six feet of deoxyribonucleic acid.

Do you feel strung out or tied down? You have twenty million kilometers of DNA inside you.

Each strand of deoxyribonucleic acid has 3.2 billion letters of coding which will enable more combinations than I can write here, but let’s just say the number would be a one followed by more than three billion zeros. You think you are unique? Well, you are. And yet you are 99.9 % the same as everyone else and we are all related, but that is another story for another time.

Although, our human species has evolved with a two-strand DNA found in each of the twenty-three pairs of chromosomes in every cell of the body, this was not our original blueprint. There are extra strands sometimes called “junk” DNA. These disconnected strands are really an essential part of our original genetic blueprint, and, who knows, they could be the most important of all, used for something that we have no idea exists.

DNA, the very source of life, is not alive itself. As geneticist Richard Lewontin puts it, deoxyribonucleic acid is “among the most nonreactive, chemically inert molecules in the living world.”

Because DNA is so inert, it can last a long time as the saga of Monica’s blue dress reminds us. License plate photos: Max Clarke

In 1869, Johann Friedrich Miescher at the University of Tübingen in southern Germany, upstream from Mannheim, where Big Brother played not so long ago, was looking at the pus in surgical bandages through a microscope, similar to the ones you can get from sites like EduLab these days.. He noticed that there was a large amount of a material he called nuclein because it was in the nuclei of cells.

He thought this material nuclein must be important because there was so much of it. Later, in a letter to his uncle, Miescher suggested that these unusual molecules could have to do with heredity. This was such an amazing insight that everyone ignored it for eighty-five years, now scientists today are using microscopes daily to find all sorts of information out about a persons biological makeup.

They all assumed that DNA was too simple to transmit heredity since it had only four parts, or nucleotides. Nowadays, we know that DNA isn’t too simple to influence an individual’s biological makeup, and tests such as https://trugenx.com/hereditary-cancer-screening/ can now be done to see if something has the potential to run in the family. With scientific advancements, DNA can now be used to connect lost families or to show who a child’s biological parents are. It’s popular for a lot of people to use DNA for paternity testing in Providence RI, as well as all over the world, to ensure that the child’s biological father is present for its upbringing.

How could anything with just four basic elements carry the whole story of life?

When we were young, our father taught us the morse code. It has just two basic components, a dot and a dash. You can write War and Peace with the morse code, and you can write all the other books in the world with it too.

It became clear over time that DNA was an important part of making proteins, but proteins were made outside of the nucleus so how was DNA, inside the nucleus, communicating the protein making instructions?

Finally investigators realized that the medium of communication between DNA and the proteins outside of the cell was ribonucleic acid (RNA).

So now everyone grasped that DNA was indeed paramount in the transmission of heredity, but what was its structure? How did it do that transmitting?

Who was going to be the first to describe how deoxyribonucleic acid actually worked?

Improbably enough, the first people to crack the DNA code were four scientists in England, who a. were new to biochemistry, b. didn’t work together as a team, and c. were rather childish, competitive individuals who often didn’t speak to each other.

James Watson (right) could have been Seymour Glass. He was a child prodigy, a member of The Quiz Kids, a highly popular radio program, he entered the University of Chicago at age fifteen, earned a PhD by twenty-two, and he had a full head of academically willful hair.

“It was my hope,” wrote Watson, “that the gene might be solved without my learning any chemistry.”

Maurice Wilkins was convinced from the outset that the DNA structure was helical. Wilkins, the boffin (British slang for a nerdy science type) of the group, had worked on the atom bomb during World War II.

Francis Crick wrote the story of his life and called it What Mad Pursuit. He wrote a seven page letter to his son here explaining what he and Watson had discovered in 1953, the double helix as the molecular structure of DNA. This letter recently sold at auction for the most that has ever been paid for a private letter.

For this breaking of the genetic code, Crick, Watson and Maurice Wilkins were awarded the Nobel Prize for medicine in 1962 and Rosalind Franklin was not since the Nobel is awarded only to the living. It must be said that Rosalind Franklin, who played a large part in the project, was treated very shabbily in this whole affair.

Men of science do not always behave nobly. They are human, after all, and as apt to act ignobly as the rest of us. Rosalind Franklin’s images of X-ray diffraction confirming the helical structure of DNA were shown to Watson without her approval or knowledge.

Rosalind Franklin came to King’s College, London, in early 1951 and that summer she took the famous ‘Photo 51? and made important studies of the DNA molecule. Francis Crick and James Watson of Cambridge University “obtained” Photo 51, and some of Franklin’s data and with their own deductions built the first correct model of the DNA molecule.

Franklin’s habit of intensely looking people in the eye while being concise, impatient and directly confrontational to the point of abrasiveness unnerved many of her colleagues, but this is no excuse for some of the chicanery that went on with her private papers.

Rosalind Franklin was female and Jewish, and Crick and Watson were male, immature and not a little pigheaded.

Rosalind Franklin died in 1958 at the age of 37 of ovarian cancer. One key ingredient to winning the Nobel is longevity. There are cases of Nobel laureates who won the prize fifty years after the work they had done. They had to be living, though. There are no posthumous Nobel awards.

In 1921, Albert Einstein was awarded the Nobel prize for work he had done in 1905. This was for his explanation of the photoelectric effect, because relativity was considered still somewhat controversial in 1921.

Francis Crick, the son of a Northampton shoemaker, worked until 1976 in the Cambridge Laboratory for Molecular Biology before accepting a post as a neurobiologist at the Salk Institute in La Jolla, California.

James Watson returned to America in 1956 and taught at Harvard for the next twenty years. He was director of the National Center for Human Genome Research from 1989 to 1992.

Watson’s book The Double Helix (1967), compulsory reading for future biology students, is an entertaining tell all that almost ruined his friendship with Crick, who tried in vain to prevent it from being published.

The Double Helix has more in common with Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood than with, say, The History of the English Speaking Peoples. It’s not a scholarly history. It’s more like a memoir crossed with narrative non-fiction. As in the New Journalism, where the account of an event is inextricably mixed with the writer’s personal circumstances and biases, The Double Helix doesn’t represent the objective truth about the search for the structure and function of DNA, but Watson’s own take on that research.

I wish I were DNA Helicase, so I could unzip your genes.

What does DNA stand for? National Dyslexics Association.

I wish I was adenine, then I could get paired with U.

Did you just mutate for a stop codon? Because you’re talking nonsense!

What did the shepherd say when he read that scientists were implanting human DNA in sheep? Bloody hell, I’ve been doing that for years.

Doctor: Bad news, your DNA is backwards. Patient: And…?

Ménage à trois! Ligand seeks two receptors into binding and mutual phosphorylation. Let’s get together and transduce some signals.

One strand of DNA to another strand of DNA: Do these genes make me look fat?

See you next week?

Kathi McDonald Sam Andrew

_______________________________________________

Cathexis can be seen as the opposite of catharsis. Catharsis is letting it all out. Cathexis is holding it all in, retaining it.

Cathexis: the investment of the libido in objects. An example would be Freud’s cathexis of interest around sexuality.

In German the everyday word that Freud uses for the learned, Greek term cathexis is Besetzung. If we had an English equivalent of Besetzung it would be ‘a Besitting.’ The verb is besetzen: to occupy.

Given Freud’s fondness for mechanico-electric metaphors, a more accurate word than cathexis might be ‘charge.’ Besetz is the word used in public bathrooms to mean that someone is already using the facility. Ocupado.

Grand passion This book was written by Lucian Freud’s daughter.

Esther Freud

Cathexis is the investment of mental or emotional energy in a person, object, or idea.

James Strachey used the Greek word cathexis (???????) to translate Freud’s word Besetzung. Why? Besetzung was a perfectly good word. Why enshrine the term in some sort of pseudo classicism?

Besetzung is a common word in German, a word that can mean ‘occupation’ or an ‘electrical charge.’ Or, was the word cathexis used, because of the meaning in this joke: When Angela Merkel flew to Greece, they asked her on the customs delaration, Besetzung (occupation) ? And she wrote, “Oh, no, I’m just here for a few days.”

This is where the translator can be a traitor. Look at the words id, ego, superego. Freud never wrote these words. In German, he wrote it, I and over I. Es, ich und überich. Freud didn’t use Latin. He used German. So when we read id, ego and superego, we have a very different idea of what Freud said from what he actually said. The same is true with cathexis. Freud wrote comfortable, everyday words and his translators used Greek and Latin terms, one of them, cathexis, entirely coined for the occasion. This is a betrayal of the person you are translating into English. If Freud uses an everyday word like Besetzung, shouldn’t you use an everyday word like occupation to translate him? Maybe such a word as Besetzung was too loaded with a war time meaning? But, still, Freud was Jewish, so… ? People are hardly going to think Freud will use the word Besetzung in the same sense that German High Command did.

The word cathexis was first used in 1922.

I once knew a cat named Cathexis. She mentioned that she came from Texas. I said, “If that’s so, and I doubt it, you know, then your real name’s probably Alexis.

In his psychoanalytic theory of personality, Freud suggested that psychic energy is generated by the libido (Libidobesetzung). The sign says This uni (university) is occupied.

Greek kathexis, holding, retention, from katekhein, to hold fast : kat-, kata-, intensive pref.; see cata- + ekhein

Steam punk psychiatry? Freud often described the functioning of psychosexual energies in mechanical terms, influenced perhaps by the dominance of the steam engine at the end of the nineteenth century.

Cathexis has entered pop culture, of course. There is an episode of StarTrek called Cathexis. There are oil companies called Cathexis (!). The word is misused in all sorts of ways by the kind of people who think that the use of a polysyllable will make them sound important.

From a television guide: Cathexis is a collection of erotic stories and images where reality is transcended through sexual excess. An enchanting dominatrix reshapes a beautiful boy into her female plaything; A mysterious metal box creates organic hallucinations; A young woman becomes sexually obsessed with the creature left in her care. Oh, boy. Where do they get this stuff? I’m glad I don’t have to watch that. The thing is, many people would actually be enthralled when watching this and people often take to this sexual dynamic in their personal relationships, however, to those that do like to play the dominant and submissive roles, the subs do have to be aware of the signs to ensure they are safe and in the right hands when being dominated by a male or female. Although those who get into it usually know the risks, you can never know what will happen and safe words are a necessity. All that latex can really make people start feeling alive and transform them, mostly in a positive way.

Remember the Orgasmatron in Sleeper?

There was some cathecting going on in that room.

Use cathexis in a sentence: His frustration with his father was repressed, but re-emerged through a cathexis in relation to his boss.

America was a mistake, a giant mistake. Sigmund Freud

Sigmund Freud was a mistake, a giant mistake. Sam Andrew Although Lucian Freud was a great artist who worked hard and did some beautiful things.

How the guys down the pub look at it: Guy A: Man, have you seen Joe? What’s up with him lately? Guy B: Being an obsessive stalker like always. This time his cathexis is the girl next door. Guy A: That’s screwed up.

Join LinkedIn and see how you are connected to Cathexis. It’s free. Uh, no, thank you.

Cathexis Oil and Gas is a well capitalized private oil and gas company located in downtown Houston. Cathexis will participate in non-op as well as operated opportunities utilizing industry best practices. Areas of interest span all of North America. Uh, no, thank you.

That kind of selfish, spiritually destructive, motherly cathexis is best perpetrated on geese, dogs and a cat. Uh, no, I don’t think so.

`The cathexis between mother and daughter-essential, distorted, misused – is the great unwritten story. And why don’t we leave it that way?

A band called Cathexis plays death metal down in Austin, Texas. Well, OK, as long as I don’t have to listen to it. I’m sure that they are very talented, though.

Cathexis is related to obsession. It is the concentration of mental energy on one particular person, idea, or object (especially to an unhealthy degree).

Now this I can relate to. I’ve been obsessed with one thing or another all my life.

When used to define narcissism, the term cathexis refers to the fact that one experiences one’s self-concept as inseparable from one’s self. It highlights the intimate integration of this self-concept. It becomes easier to understand if we think of it in relation to the integration of the sense of identity. Cathexis, then, means the integration of one’s identity. We term this integration, in our work, self-realization. In other words, the cathexis of the self is a psychoanalytic concept that approximates our concept of the realization of the self. Hmmmm. Maybe I will listen to that death metal after all.

“I’d been to 20 N. Moore Street and watched the throngs of `mourners’ making instant cathexis for the cameras, `identifying’ with the young `victims’ as avatars of Camelot cut down in their prime, a perfect couple who embodied our hopes and dreams, symbols of America’s longing for nobility, etc.” Guy Trebay, Eyes Wide Shut, The Village Voice, Aug 3, 1999

The notion of a cathexis is closely similar to the philosophical idea of an “intentional” state, which derives from Franz Brentano, Freud’s teacher and mentor. Freud initially held the object of a cathexis always to be intrapsychic, a position which is untenable and which he largely abandoned after 1915, when he began (correctly) to take cathected objects generally to be persons or events, not their representations. His idea of a cathexis as “entering into” its object contains a valuable and neglected insight, which undermines the centrality of the distinction between the “outer” and “inner” realms of experience. This distinction should not be confused with the key distinction between “fantasy” and “actuality” with respect to cathectic objects. So-called “inner” (fantasy) objects are generally “inside” the mind in a metaphorical sense only. (Psychiatric words found on the Net)

Keep in mind that Freud never used the word cathexis. He could have. He could have easily coined the word Kathexis in German. But he didn’t. He used an ordinary word Besetzung and he was happy with it and didn’t look for another word. The placard says This concert hall is occupied.

Cathexis is the city where humanity (of a sort) has reëmerged following a global transcendence into the Collective Reexistence, the unified psychic ocean of all human identity. (Game instructions on the Internet)

The narcissist cathexes (emotionally invests) with grandiosity everything he owns or does: his nearest and dearest, his work, his environment. But, as time passes, this pathologically intense aura fades. The narcissist finds fault with things and people he had first thought impeccable. He energetically berates and denigrates that which he equally zealously exulted and praised only a short while before.

The man who wrote the above then writes: Why is it, then, that when I revert to my writing a mere few weeks later, I find the syntax tortured, the grammar shoddy, the choice of words forced, the whole piece repulsively bloviated, and the ideas hopelessly tangled and dim? Why not try writing something concrete and real, then, instead of a lot of convoluted claptrap that you don’t even understand or believe yourself?

Fuck the jargon. Keep it short and concise.

When you are beset (besetzt) by someone or something, you are occupied with it. It takes up your whole space. You are possessed.

Sentimental attachment to a keepsake, a family heirloom, or a photograph would be an example of cathexis.

Patriotism and other impassioned identifications with groups and systems of belief are also forms of cathexis.

This is often why you are not going to talk someone out of being, say, a conservative.

People hold all kinds of beliefs for rational reasons, irrational reasons, and for reasons that they are not even conscious of.

When you have an argument with a partner or friend and it is on your mind, you can keep going over it, thinking about it, what will happen if you do this, what won’t happen if you do this, and so on, you are investing mental and emotional energy in that situation, event, and person. This is a fairly common thing, right? This must happen to everyone.

His cathexis on stamp collecting is becoming tiresome.

Is that a good sentence? It doesn’t seem like a good sentence. It feels as if the word cathexis has been dragged in there. It doesn’t feel natural.

Alison Bechdel wrote this: In a narcissistic cathexis, you invest more energy into your ideas about another person than in the actual, objective, external person.

That’s much better, isn’t it? It actually makes sense, and we have all had this experience.

Wait a minute. I’ve seen this gastrocnemius before. (gastro = belly and kneme = leg) The belly of the leg = calf.

Well, hey, how much sense does calf make anyway? Gastrocnemius is a much more descriptive word, although it may not hurt to translate it into English: legbelly.

Your cathexis is scratching my dogma.

Donald Rumsfeld’s cathexis with power blinded him, and still blinds him, to the real harm that he did to many people during his Shock and Awe period. He thinks that a simple trademarked grin is going to carry him over his callous irresponsibility to millions of people.

At least Robert McNamara learned something.

See you next week?

Sam Andrew

__________________________________________________